Announcements

Join the ongoing conversation on Discord: https://discord.gg/w6Tpkp2

Please read the current update for instructions on downloading the latest update. Players with Mac versions of the game will not be affected, but you will have a slightly longer wait for your version of the new maps. Please make a copy of your character folder before running the new update, just to make sure you don't lose any of your custom work.

It looks like we can give everyone a list of minimum specs for running City of Titans. Please keep in mind that this is 'for now' until we are able to add more graphics and other system refinements. Currently you will need :
Windows 10 or later required; no Intel integrated graphics like UHD, must have AMD or NVIDIA card or discrete chipset with 4Gb or more of VRAM
At least 16GB of main DRAM.
These stats may change as we continue to test.

To purchase your copy of the City of Titans Launcher, visit our store at https://store.missingworldsmedia.com/ A purchase of $50 or more will give you a link to download the Launcher for Windows or Mac based machines.

Newbie question. Where are the villains going to be?

239 posts / 0 new
Last post
Cyclops
Cyclops's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 8 months ago
11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 04/10/2015 - 17:24
Newbie question. Where are the villains going to be?

I never liked the islands of Arachnos. COH never wanted parents to see their kid stealing a car or selling drugs...even in a game. So evil factions fighting each other was the solution.

How COT will solve this I don't know.

BUT. If nothing has been planned yet i suggest a little something different.
Have a zone in the city itself. its too dangerous for even the cops to go it. Typical eastern city blight.

add to that a vast underground city linking sewers, subways, old civil war ruins and 1920 gangsters hideouts. This underground maze will boast secret passages and links all over the city.

Toss in the ship yards, A decaying industrial zone, an abandoned amusement park, and a PvP zone or two...and i think you're good to go.

Two sides of the same city. one light, one dark

Fireheart
Fireheart's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 2 weeks ago
11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/05/2013 - 13:45
If I understand what I've

If I understand what I've been reading here, for years, the plan is for the villains and heroes and others to all inhabit the same space. Something akin to DCUO.

Be Well!
Fireheart

Lutan
Lutan's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 2 months ago
11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 02/02/2014 - 15:08
That is how I understood it

That is how I understood it too. You can be a hero everywhere in Titan City as well as you can be a villain.

Kiyori Anoyui
Kiyori Anoyui's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 months 2 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/10/2013 - 11:03
One thing I didn't like about

One thing I didn't like about the co-inhabited DCUO was that it was clear who was on the red-side(because they had a red name) and who was on the blue-side(because they had a blue name) So you could just be going along doing your daily routine and then someone comes up and kills you for no reason. I think if they are going to co-inhabit people they should make it completely ambiguous as to what side anyone is on. In my opinion it should only tell you if someones bad(by a red name) if they are in the act of doing nefarious deeds like stealing a purse or putting kittens on high up tree branches. And on the other side of that if you are a bad guy you are going to attack anyone whether it's a hero or another villain so it doesn't matter. But just like in real life if you punch someone out in public be sure to defend yourself against a bunch of people or be ready to run from the police. I don't care much for the, if you step over this line you become a target but if you take a step back you are okay.

You can be considered a hero and do bad things, but you could also be a villain but save someone.

If I learned anything from Wreck-It Ralph, just cause you're a bad guy, doesn't make you "bad guy".

The Carnival of Light in the Phoenix Rising
"We never lose our demons, we only learn to live above them." - The Ancient One

Avatar by lilshironeko

Cyclops
Cyclops's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 8 months ago
11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 04/10/2015 - 17:24
Thanks guys!

Thanks guys!

Nyktos
Nyktos's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 years 6 months ago
11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 11/02/2014 - 16:07
Kiyori Anoyui wrote:
Kiyori Anoyui wrote:

One thing I didn't like about the co-inhabited DCUO was that it was clear who was on the red-side(because they had a red name) and who was on the blue-side(because they had a blue name) So you could just be going along doing your daily routine and then someone comes up and kills you for no reason. I think if they are going to co-inhabit people they should make it completely ambiguous as to what side anyone is on. In my opinion it should only tell you if someones bad(by a red name) if they are in the act of doing nefarious deeds like stealing a purse or putting kittens on high up tree branches. And on the other side of that if you are a bad guy you are going to attack anyone whether it's a hero or another villain so it doesn't matter. But just like in real life if you punch someone out in public be sure to defend yourself against a bunch of people or be ready to run from the police. I don't care much for the, if you step over this line you become a target but if you take a step back you are okay.
You can be considered a hero and do bad things, but you could also be a villain but save someone.
If I learned anything from Wreck-It Ralph, just cause you're a bad guy, doesn't make you "bad guy".

I think it's been mentioned before that they might do a system were the morality of a player avatar would not be very obvious on the surface. Some of the other forumnites discussed separate hospitals for villains, heroes, and vigilantes that of course wouldn't all be in the same place.

Formerly known as Bleddyn

Do you want to be a hero?

My characters

Riptide
Riptide's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 days 6 hours ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/09/2013 - 07:01
I think they have also said

I think they have also said that there will be no open-world PvP where you can be attacked by another player simply because you con red to them.

They have mentioned, maybe, having a PvP instance of the world which both players will have to enter for that to happen but I don't think anything is anywhere close to finalized.

"I don't think you understand the gravity of your situation."

Foradain
Foradain's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 2 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/25/2013 - 21:06
If you're looking to confirm

If you're looking to confirm what Rigel just said, check here.

warcabbit wrote:

PVP. Let's discuss.

1: You will never be forced to PvP

2: You can, in fact, talk about Fight Club.

3: Seriously. You will never, ever be forced to PvP.

In fact, if you feel like ignoring PvP, you can close this update right now...

Foradain, Mage of Phoenix Rising.
Foradain's Character Conclave
.
Avatar courtesy of Satellite9 Irezoomie

Lothic
Lothic's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 3 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/02/2013 - 00:27
Bleddyn wrote:
Bleddyn wrote:

I think it's been mentioned before that they might do a system were the morality of a player avatar would not be very obvious on the surface. Some of the other forumnites discussed separate hospitals for villains, heroes, and vigilantes that of course wouldn't all be in the same place.

This has been more or less my understanding of how things are going to work. Like warcabbit said there will NOT be open world PvP, but everyone will be more or less mixed together in the same zones regardless of your current alignment.

To take this one step further I imagine there are going to be areas within each zone/district that lean more "blue" or "red" as well as areas that are going to be considered "neutral zones" or "no-mans lands". This would mean that there might be zones that are effectively 90% blue or 90% red at least as far as the overall "vibe" of the zone goes and what kind of NPCs you can find there. But those percentages I mentioned wouldn't stop anybody from going to any zone they wanted to. For instance there might be a "strongly red" zone that a heroic leaning character can go to to bust heads or there might be a "strongly blue" zone that a villain would risk going to cause big-time trouble or anything in-between.

CoH player from April 25, 2004 to November 30, 2012

Interdictor
Interdictor's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 years 5 months ago
11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 08/22/2013 - 05:26
Lothic wrote:
Lothic wrote:

Bleddyn wrote:
I think it's been mentioned before that they might do a system were the morality of a player avatar would not be very obvious on the surface. Some of the other forumnites discussed separate hospitals for villains, heroes, and vigilantes that of course wouldn't all be in the same place.

This has been more or less my understanding of how things are going to work. Like warcabbit said there will NOT be open world PvP, but everyone will be more or less mixed together in the same zones regardless of your current alignment.
To take this one step further I imagine there are going to be areas within each zone/district that lean more "blue" or "red" as well as areas that are going to be considered "neutral zones" or "no-mans lands". This would mean that there might be zones that are effectively 90% blue or 90% red at least as far as the overall "vibe" of the zone goes and what kind of NPCs you can find there. But those percentages I mentioned wouldn't stop anybody from going to any zone they wanted to. For instance there might be a "strongly red" zone that a heroic leaning character can go to to bust heads or there might be a "strongly blue" zone that a villain would risk going to cause big-time trouble or anything in-between.

Yes - I believe the devs have said that while there will be no red/blue exclusive zones, there will definitely be "bad parts of town" or somesuch

Redlynne
Redlynne's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 day 14 hours ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/28/2013 - 21:15
Right. My expectation is

Right. My expectation is that while any PC can GO to any part of town ... depending on your Alignments (Honor, Law, Peace), different parts of town will be hostile/safe for you to move around in (ie. aggro on sight).

My default assumption is that the Alignments of your PC will be "checked" against the Alignments of the NPCs in the area on a 1-5 scale.

1 = Low
2 = Mid-low
3 = Middle
4 = Mid-high
5 = High

So take your PC's Alignments, "rate" them on the 1-5 scale, and then cross check against the environment NPCs. If the differential is 0 then the NPCs are Allies (and therefore, Friendly). If the differential is 1, then the NPCs are Neutral (can be attacked, but won't attack you first and will become hostile if attacked by you). If the differential is 2-4, then the NPCs are hostile and will attack you on sight.

Run this Alignment cross-check against all three Alignment axes (Honor, Law, Peace) to get 3 "social" responses by NPCs to PCs ... Allied, Neutral or Hostile. If 2 of the responses are the same, use that response. So if 2 of the Alignment Axes result in a Neutral reaction, then that gets a "majority vote" in how the NPCs respond to the PC's presence (note that matching 3 Alignment Axes is merely a subset of this condition). If there's a 3-way split (ie. Friendly, Neutral and Hostile) then the NPCs are Hostile. Such a design layout makes it possible to create "safe" areas for Heroes and Villains with "neutral ground" in between, but then leaves "most" of the city's NPCs as being hostile to the presence of your PC (thus making Street Sweeping possible).

Now, obviously, I'm probably being too simplistic with the 1-5 scale (could easily be a 1-10 scale for a more nuanced mix), but the important thing is to illustrate the principles involved and the "shape" of the idea so it can be played with.

At least, this is how *I* would want to handle making a city in which there are no barriers to entry, yet you want to have "welcoming" as well as "hostile" parts of town be different for different PCs. It starts putting things onto the path of being a continuum in shades of grey instead of being purely black vs white.


Verbogeny is one of many pleasurettes afforded a creatific thinkerizer.
Kiyori Anoyui
Kiyori Anoyui's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 months 2 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/10/2013 - 11:03
I like this 5 shades of grey

I like this 5 shades of grey idea Red!

The Carnival of Light in the Phoenix Rising
"We never lose our demons, we only learn to live above them." - The Ancient One

Avatar by lilshironeko

Redlynne
Redlynne's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 day 14 hours ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/28/2013 - 21:15
Heh. I figured at least

Heh. I figured at least someone (other than me) would. ^_~

The real question is ... do the MWM Developers like the idea?


Verbogeny is one of many pleasurettes afforded a creatific thinkerizer.
Lothic
Lothic's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 3 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/02/2013 - 00:27
Kiyori Anoyui wrote:
Kiyori Anoyui wrote:

I like this 5 shades of grey idea Red!

Redlynne wrote:

Heh. I figured at least someone (other than me) would. ^_~
The real question is ... do the MWM Developers like the idea?

Who knows... 5 or 10 shades might not be enough. Maybe they'll expand the idea out to 50 shades of grey ;)

CoH player from April 25, 2004 to November 30, 2012

Kiyori Anoyui
Kiyori Anoyui's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 months 2 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/10/2013 - 11:03
Lothic wrote:
Lothic wrote:

Kiyori Anoyui wrote:
I like this 5 shades of grey idea Red!

Redlynne wrote:
Heh. I figured at least someone (other than me) would. ^_~
The real question is ... do the MWM Developers like the idea?

Who knows... 5 or 10 shades might not be enough. Maybe they'll expand the idea out to 50 shades of grey ;)

You couldn't help yourself could you?! :D

The Carnival of Light in the Phoenix Rising
"We never lose our demons, we only learn to live above them." - The Ancient One

Avatar by lilshironeko

Tannim222
Tannim222's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 days 12 hours ago
Developer11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 01/16/2013 - 12:47
Interdictor wrote:
Interdictor wrote:

Yes - I believe the devs have said that while there will be no red/blue exclusive zones, there will definitely be "bad parts of town" or somesuch

That's inaccurate. Outside of pvp player heroes won't have to deal with player villains and player villains won't with deal with player heroes. It is part of the design of phased instances on a mega server.


I don't use a nerf bat, I have a magic crowbar!
- Combat Mechanic -
Tech Team.
Nina Guardian
Nina Guardian's picture
Offline
Last seen: 5 years 1 day ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/10/2013 - 20:29
Tannim222 wrote:
Tannim222 wrote:

That's inaccurate. Outside of pvp player heroes won't have to deal with player villains and player villains won't with deal with player heroes. It is part of the design of phased instances on a mega server.

Uh, actually, that's not good news (to me anyway). Why artificially split the community?

Phoenix Rising's Model Citizen

Kiyori Anoyui
Kiyori Anoyui's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 months 2 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/10/2013 - 11:03
Yes, I am also confused by

Yes, I am also a little confused by that sentence...

The way it sounds is that it will be exactly like CoX where they are in totally different "worlds", so what your saying is that they will be in the same area but totally separated from each other? I had the notion that it was going to be coinhabited

The Carnival of Light in the Phoenix Rising
"We never lose our demons, we only learn to live above them." - The Ancient One

Avatar by lilshironeko

Redlynne
Redlynne's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 day 14 hours ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/28/2013 - 21:15
(No subject)


Verbogeny is one of many pleasurettes afforded a creatific thinkerizer.
Nina Guardian
Nina Guardian's picture
Offline
Last seen: 5 years 1 day ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/10/2013 - 20:29
And how is it even going to

And how is it even going to work? If there are 3 'types' of 'morality' or whatever? Is someone with high Law, low Honor and high Violence a hero or a villain? What about the reverse, low Law, high Honor, low violence?

And there will be mission which can change those qualities. If I switch from however 'hero' is defined because of a mission choice, will I suddenly be cut off from everyone I knew and forced to a world of strangers?

This makes no sense.

No, I don't like this at all.

Phoenix Rising's Model Citizen

Lothic
Lothic's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 3 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/02/2013 - 00:27
Tannim222 wrote:
Tannim222 wrote:

Interdictor wrote:
Yes - I believe the devs have said that while there will be no red/blue exclusive zones, there will definitely be "bad parts of town" or somesuch

That's inaccurate. Outside of pvp player heroes won't have to deal with player villains and player villains won't with deal with player heroes. It is part of the design of phased instances on a mega server.

As the others have responded I really hope this is NOT how it's going to work.

With what you're saying we might as well have a completely unique (and segregated) "red side" and "blue side" like we did in CoH. In fact this would even be worse than that because you're talking about "reusing" a single set of zones to act as a phased "red side" and phased "blue side" so we wouldn't even get uniquely red or blue areas.

We either have a very major case of...

or you're going to have to completely rethink what you're doing here vis-a-vis player interaction. This frankly doesn't sound very promising at all.

CoH player from April 25, 2004 to November 30, 2012

Kiyori Anoyui
Kiyori Anoyui's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 months 2 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/10/2013 - 11:03
I prefer this Lothic :p

The Carnival of Light in the Phoenix Rising
"We never lose our demons, we only learn to live above them." - The Ancient One

Avatar by lilshironeko

Lothic
Lothic's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 3 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/02/2013 - 00:27
Kiyori Anoyui wrote:
Kiyori Anoyui wrote:

I prefer this Lothic :p
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAhwIu56aHE

Major Payne was a decent movie, but clearly it "borrowed" that line from Cool Hand Luke.

Based on how the alignment system is supposed to work I don't even know how they could divide up the playerbase along strict "hero" or "villain" lines to begin with. With all due respect to Tannim222 I can only hope he's smoking some very bad weed or having a mild psychotic break and hopefuly will come to his senses soon.

CoH player from April 25, 2004 to November 30, 2012

Kiyori Anoyui
Kiyori Anoyui's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 months 2 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/10/2013 - 11:03
Oh they 100% took it from

Oh they 100% took it from Cool Hand Luke, but they did it magnificently :D

I also have no idea how that would happen, the only way I could think would be to check alignment status at the beginning and end of mission. So if you go in at morality 5 as a hero and come out 4 then it sends you to the villain "instance". But I along with you and Nina do not want that to be the case!

The Carnival of Light in the Phoenix Rising
"We never lose our demons, we only learn to live above them." - The Ancient One

Avatar by lilshironeko

Tannim222
Tannim222's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 days 12 hours ago
Developer11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 01/16/2013 - 12:47
Nina Guardian wrote:
Nina Guardian wrote:

And how is it even going to work? If there are 3 'types' of 'morality' or whatever? Is someone with high Law, low Honor and high Violence a hero or a villain? What about the reverse, low Law, high Honor, low violence?
And there will be mission which can change those qualities. If I switch from however 'hero' is defined because of a mission choice, will I suddenly be cut off from everyone I knew and forced to a world of strangers?
This makes no sense.
No, I don't like this at all.

The multi-axis alignment is the base of the configuration for determining the hero, villain, vigilante, and so on types of alignment labels. There are many layers as to what has to be considered for going through the process of changing alignments between the opposing dichotomies of hero and villain.

We are not designing a single world with mass pvevp or creating a villain are on street A and heros street B.

And truthfully here, if a layer is playing a hero character and decides to keep start down a dark path there should be consequences to going too those actions. Further more as villains do things that heros aren't quite fond of, in a pve setting we would only set up a lot of causes to problems because the city isn't split by heroes staying on one side of the street and villains on another, go pvp in the alley sort of design.

If so villains could do whatever they want and heros would be forced to watch with no way of being the hero to save the day without resorting to some form of pvp. To which is in effect practically forcing pvp (in one form or another) to be the main focus of the game.

The differences here are not that area of the city is red and therefore has "red stories to tell" and this area over here is blue and has "blue stoties to tell". There is one city and player' actions determine what kind of city they live in. While ther is the dichotomy of hero and villain there is a lot of grey in between.


I don't use a nerf bat, I have a magic crowbar!
- Combat Mechanic -
Tech Team.
Brutum
Brutum's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 years 2 months ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/13/2013 - 19:18
I tend to agree. In fact I

I tend to agree. In fact I would have to say that I think even DCUO handles the situation better with their morality schematic. And I don't particularly care for it.

Puny Heroes.

Kiyori Anoyui
Kiyori Anoyui's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 months 2 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/10/2013 - 11:03
Tannim222 wrote:
Tannim222 wrote:

Nina Guardian wrote:
And how is it even going to work? If there are 3 'types' of 'morality' or whatever? Is someone with high Law, low Honor and high Violence a hero or a villain? What about the reverse, low Law, high Honor, low violence?
And there will be mission which can change those qualities. If I switch from however 'hero' is defined because of a mission choice, will I suddenly be cut off from everyone I knew and forced to a world of strangers?
This makes no sense.
No, I don't like this at all.

The multi-axis alignment is the base of the configuration for determining the hero, villain, vigilante, and so on types of alignment labels. There are many layers as to what has to be considered for going through the process of changing alignments between the opposing dichotomies of hero and villain.
We are not designing a single world with mass pvevp or creating a villain are on street A and heros street B.
And truthfully here, if a layer is playing a hero character and decides to keep start down a dark path there should be consequences to going too those actions. Further more as villains do things that heros aren't quite fond of, in a pve setting we would only set up a lot of causes to problems because the city isn't split by heroes staying on one side of the street and villains on another, go pvp in the alley sort of design.
If so villains could do whatever they want and heros would be forced to watch with no way of being the hero to save the day without resorting to some form of pvp. To which is in effect practically forcing pvp (in one form or another) to be the main focus of the game.
The differences here are not that area of the city is red and therefore has "red stories to tell" and this area over here is blue and has "blue stoties to tell". There is one city and player' actions determine what kind of city they live in. While ther is the dichotomy of hero and villain there is a lot of grey in between.

Hmmm.... Interesting. So if this is the case how exactly does the switching mechanism work? How will the consequence be ruled out and how will it get you to the other instances?

The Carnival of Light in the Phoenix Rising
"We never lose our demons, we only learn to live above them." - The Ancient One

Avatar by lilshironeko

Tannim222
Tannim222's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 days 12 hours ago
Developer11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 01/16/2013 - 12:47
To quote another dev on this

To quote another dev on this topic:

DeathSheepFromHell wrote:

Just a quick reminder to folks: forced PvP is not on the menu. That said, having full-world PvP as an option certainly *is* on the eventual menu (I say eventual because there are a whole lot of things that are not purely technical that need to be resolved for it to be sane).
We do have a system in mind for addressing this. We've tested some basics out, but are not yet anywhere near far enough along to be able to talk about it in any great detail, except to say that it takes the whole "see the world through the eyes of " idea that CoH/CoV had started to use, and takes it a quantum leap forward.

And we have gone over how to handle those "final moments of change" where pcs end up in those more or less opposing views, what happens when grouped, part of a super team and so on.


I don't use a nerf bat, I have a magic crowbar!
- Combat Mechanic -
Tech Team.
Lothic
Lothic's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 3 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/02/2013 - 00:27
Tannim222 wrote:
Tannim222 wrote:

Nina Guardian wrote:
And how is it even going to work? If there are 3 'types' of 'morality' or whatever? Is someone with high Law, low Honor and high Violence a hero or a villain? What about the reverse, low Law, high Honor, low violence?
And there will be mission which can change those qualities. If I switch from however 'hero' is defined because of a mission choice, will I suddenly be cut off from everyone I knew and forced to a world of strangers?
This makes no sense.
No, I don't like this at all.

The multi-axis alignment is the base of the configuration for determining the hero, villain, vigilante, and so on types of alignment labels. There are many layers as to what has to be considered for going through the process of changing alignments between the opposing dichotomies of hero and villain.
We are not designing a single world with mass pvevp or creating a villain are on street A and heros street B.
And truthfully here, if a layer is playing a hero character and decides to keep start down a dark path there should be consequences to going too those actions. Further more as villains do things that heros aren't quite fond of, in a pve setting we would only set up a lot of causes to problems because the city isn't split by heroes staying on one side of the street and villains on another, go pvp in the alley sort of design.
If so villains could do whatever they want and heros would be forced to watch with no way of being the hero to save the day without resorting to some form of pvp. To which is in effect practically forcing pvp (in one form or another) to be the main focus of the game.
The differences here are not that area of the city is red and therefore has "red stories to tell" and this area over here is blue and has "blue stoties to tell". There is one city and player' actions determine what kind of city they live in. While ther is the dichotomy of hero and villain there is a lot of grey in between.

OK let's start by pointing out you are probably going through all sorts of convoluted gyrations to "shoehorn" the multi-axis alignment system to a point that will identify who needs to be in one of your "hero phases" versus "villain phases". What's the point of even having a multi-axis alignment system when you're just dividing us into binary hero and villain groupings?

Towards the end of CoH we had plenty of examples of characters of various alignments being able to co-exist in the same zones. For instance the RWZ allowed everyone to play together regardless of alignment. That was the clear FUTURE of the game - by going back to some twisted version of hero/villain segregation you're throwing away all the progress CoH was making towards having a more realistic "everyone in the same world" experience.

The only real concern here is PvP and in this case it's fairly simple - you just don't allow it in PvE areas, period. It really looks like you've gotten so wrapped around the axle on PvP and how "heroes and villains" might interact that you're proposing a very retrograde, blindered view of a game that will frankly be horrible for all sorts of reasons.

Please try to restate your case for why characters based on a multi-axis alignment system must be quarantined into a binary phased existence because everything you've said so far makes for all intents and purposes NO SENSE whatsoever.

CoH player from April 25, 2004 to November 30, 2012

Lothic
Lothic's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 3 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/02/2013 - 00:27
Tannim222 wrote:
Tannim222 wrote:

To quote another dev on this topic:
DeathSheepFromHell wrote:
Just a quick reminder to folks: forced PvP is not on the menu. That said, having full-world PvP as an option certainly *is* on the eventual menu (I say eventual because there are a whole lot of things that are not purely technical that need to be resolved for it to be sane).
We do have a system in mind for addressing this. We've tested some basics out, but are not yet anywhere near far enough along to be able to talk about it in any great detail, except to say that it takes the whole "see the world through the eyes of " idea that CoH/CoV had started to use, and takes it a quantum leap forward.

And we have gone over how to handle those "final moments of change" where pcs end up in those more or less opposing views, what happens when grouped, part of a super team and so on.

Please convince me that you haven't made all this about 10x more complicated than it really should be. You wouldn't have to worry about "which phase a character should be in" if all characters co-existed in the same phases REGARDLESS of alignments. Changes in alignments would then just happen organically and characters would suffer (or reap) the consequences accordingly.

CoH player from April 25, 2004 to November 30, 2012

Lutan
Lutan's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 2 months ago
11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 02/02/2014 - 15:08
I thought the alignment

I thought the alignment system has not that much to do with whether the character is a villain or not. You could be a hero with zero lawfulness, honor and peacefulness and you could be a villain with all three of them maxed out.

It is just about the methods you use to archieve your goal, regardless of if that goal is for a good or bad cause. But it will affect how NPCs react to you and how your story progresses.

Or did I get that wrong?

Lothic
Lothic's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 3 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/02/2013 - 00:27
Lutan wrote:
Lutan wrote:

I thought the alignment system has not that much to do with whether the character is a villain or not. You could be a hero with zero lawfulness, honor and peacefulness and you could be a villain with all three of them maxed out.
It is just about the methods you use to archieve your goal, regardless of if that goal is for a good or bad cause. But it will affect how NPCs react to you and how your story progresses.
Or did I get that wrong?

Yeah apparently you did. Basically it sounds like we're all just going to still be "heroes" or "villains" regardless of our supposed alignments. *sigh*

CoH player from April 25, 2004 to November 30, 2012

Brutum
Brutum's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 years 2 months ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/13/2013 - 19:18
It does sound like a very dry

It does sound like a very dry solution to a problem with PvP that can be handled other ways at the moment.

Puny Heroes.

Kiyori Anoyui
Kiyori Anoyui's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 months 2 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/10/2013 - 11:03
I would have to agree with

I would have to agree with Lothic, I would rather be in a co-inhabited world where we can't fight each other(unless in "alleys" or whatever PVP solution is created) than be in totally separate instances.

You can look at it like a lot of tv shows and movies, a lot of times you can team with people who are not aligned with you to reach a common goal.

Example. Jet in The Last Airbender, he doesn't have the best intentions but they teamed up with him anyway.

Even though one player is "bad" doesn't mean they can't join a group of "good guys" to reach some common goal

The Carnival of Light in the Phoenix Rising
"We never lose our demons, we only learn to live above them." - The Ancient One

Avatar by lilshironeko

Lutan
Lutan's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 2 months ago
11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 02/02/2014 - 15:08
Lothic wrote:
Lothic wrote:

Lutan wrote:
I thought the alignment system has not that much to do with whether the character is a villain or not. You could be a hero with zero lawfulness, honor and peacefulness and you could be a villain with all three of them maxed out.
It is just about the methods you use to archieve your goal, regardless of if that goal is for a good or bad cause. But it will affect how NPCs react to you and how your story progresses.
Or did I get that wrong?

Yeah apparently you did. Basically it sounds like we're all just going to still be "heroes" or "villains" regardless of our supposed alignments. *sigh*

That is actually what I wanted to say. I try my best but english is not the language I grew up with, so sometimes I have difficulty to bring my point across.

I see it this way. First you decide what you want to be: hero or villain.

And then your actions define what kind of hero or villain you are by using the three axis alignment system. The story changes and NPCs will react differently to you, depending on your position on those axes.

JayBezz
JayBezz's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 years 8 months ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/08/2013 - 14:54
I think it's a mistake not

I think it's a mistake not letting hero players and villain players interact on the same map/instance. The PvP option could easily be a flag system

Blue flag for Order
Red Flag for Chaos
White flag for Independence

Each Player chooses an Ideal. If players check the PvP flag you can fight players in openworld with different ideals. You can also change your ideal anytime you are Not flagged for PvP.

That's my ideal openworld PvP.

Crowd Control Enthusiast

Lothic
Lothic's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 3 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/02/2013 - 00:27
It almost seems to me that

It almost seems to me that Tannim222 (and perhaps the rest of the Devs) have not truly embraced the multi-axis alignment system they came up with. They seem to be clinging to the outdated mindset that there are going to be strictly defined "heroes" and "villains" in this game.

The whole notion of heroness or villainess is in the mind of the players themselves - there should be nothing in CoT that actually relies on ANYTHING to be strictly defined in those binary terms. This obviously includes both PvE and PvP. In this game teams should be formable by ANY group of players regardless of alignment. It's up to the players to decide if they want to do missions that would be deemed "heroic" or "villainous" in nature. If a bunch of villains decide to team up to run heroic missions that should be their choice - it might be a weird choice - but the game shouldn't be keep those players from doing that.

Likewise any PvP should be organized along the lines the PLAYERS want, not whether the game pigeonholes them into being a hardwired hero or villain. The groups that the players form will naturally define who the heroes and villains are. Supergroups will form that require "all members to have such-n-such ranges of alignment" so the players themselves will decide if they want "hero" SGs or "villain" SGs or anything in-between.

See how easy all that would be Tannim222? Please feel free to tell me why any of what I just said couldn't work.

CoH player from April 25, 2004 to November 30, 2012

Kiyori Anoyui
Kiyori Anoyui's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 months 2 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/10/2013 - 11:03
JayBezz wrote:
JayBezz wrote:

I think it's a mistake not letting hero players and villain players interact on the same map/instance. The PvP option could easily be a flag system
Blue flag for Order
Red Flag for Chaos
White flag for Independence
Each Player chooses an Ideal. If players check the PvP flag you can fight players in openworld with different ideals. You can also change your ideal anytime you are Not flagged for PvP.
That's my ideal openworld PvP.

I think this is a very good way to go about it. It is alot like how GTA 5 handles it. You can go online and do PVP or you can put it in passive mode so people can't just kill you whenever they up and feel like it.

The Carnival of Light in the Phoenix Rising
"We never lose our demons, we only learn to live above them." - The Ancient One

Avatar by lilshironeko

Lothic
Lothic's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 3 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/02/2013 - 00:27
Kiyori Anoyui wrote:
Kiyori Anoyui wrote:

JayBezz wrote:
I think it's a mistake not letting hero players and villain players interact on the same map/instance. The PvP option could easily be a flag system
Blue flag for Order
Red Flag for Chaos
White flag for Independence
Each Player chooses an Ideal. If players check the PvP flag you can fight players in openworld with different ideals. You can also change your ideal anytime you are Not flagged for PvP.
That's my ideal openworld PvP.

I think this is a very good way to go about it. It is alot like how GTA 5 handles it. You can go online and do PVP or you can put it in passive mode so people can't just kill you whenever they up and feel like it.

The point of course is that the PLAYER is in control of how they want their alignment concept to play out in terms of who they want to PvP with or against.

CoH player from April 25, 2004 to November 30, 2012

Tannim222
Tannim222's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 days 12 hours ago
Developer11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 01/16/2013 - 12:47
Lutan wrote:
Lutan wrote:

I thought the alignment system has not that much to do with whether the character is a villain or not. You could be a hero with zero lawfulness, honor and peacefulness and you could be a villain with all three of them maxed out.
It is just about the methods you use to archieve your goal, regardless of if that goal is for a good or bad cause. But it will affect how NPCs react to you and how your story progresses.
Or did I get that wrong?

Lothic wrote:

Yeah apparently you did. Basically it sounds like we're all just going to still be "heroes" or "villains" regardless of our supposed alignments. *sigh*

The multi-axis alignments allows for a lot of the grey areas between the two dichotomies of heroes and villains. It allows for differences in what may make up a hero or villain, but at some point, actions should and do dictate what is heroic and what is villainous. Hence it’s a multi-layered alignment system.

Lothic wrote:

Please convince me that you haven't made all this about 10x more complicated than it really should be. You wouldn't have to worry about "which phase a character should be in" if all characters co-existed in the same phases REGARDLESS of alignments. Changes in alignments would then just happen organically and characters would suffer (or reap) the consequences accordingly.

Kiyori Anoyui wrote:

I would have to agree with Lothic, I would rather be in a co-inhabited world where we can't fight each other(unless in "alleys" or whatever PVP solution is created) than be in totally separate instances.>

The issue is that hiding the pvp in other places or requiring a duel to resolve a difference is that it doesn’t actually resolve the course of the conflict.
Here is a basic example: A villain player goes to attack some cops in PvE setting. The hero player sees this and doesn’t like it is absolutely powerless to stop the villain player unless the villain player accepts a duel or that we in some other way force a confrontation on both players to resolve the course of action. PvP in all forms must and always be optional and never make the player feel forced they must resort to it to resolve a difference. Otherwise players aren’t able to properly play a villain because they can’t actually thwart or affect hero players and players can’t properly play a hero because they can never thwart or affect villains. The only way to provide that sort of action is in PvP.

Event the "let me flag myself" system doesn't prevent this as there only those flagged can engage and others can't and therefore on the same instance a player who isn't flagged can do things that another player disagrees with and is still powerless to stop it. Or others for forced to contend with it as players do tricky things like use the environment (npcs) to cause trouble for opposing alignments which is yet a form of pvp or even griefing if the other player doesn't want to be bothered in that way.


I don't use a nerf bat, I have a magic crowbar!
- Combat Mechanic -
Tech Team.
Lothic
Lothic's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 3 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/02/2013 - 00:27
Tannim222]<p>The multi-axis
Tannim222 wrote:

The multi-axis alignments allows for a lot of the grey areas between the two dichotomies of heroes and villains. It allows for differences in what may make up a hero or villain, but at some point, actions should and do dictate what is heroic and what is villainous. Hence it’s a multi-layered alignment system.

This is NOT a multi-axis alignment system of any sort. You’re still despreately trying to force a binary hero/villain duality on top of some abomination of a supposedly "open spectrum alignment" scheme. A true multi-axis alignment system would completely abandon the idea of strict binary "good" and "evil" endpoints and allow for a fully open spectrum of morality. You've basically ruined any usefulness of playing around with "multi-axis alignments" and fallen back to effectively just having binary heroes and villains as far as the mechanics of the game is concerned. There is no true "grey" under your system.

Tannim222 wrote:

The issue is that hiding the pvp in other places or requiring a duel to resolve a difference is that it doesn’t actually resolve the course of the conflict.
Here is a basic example: A villain player goes to attack some cops in PvE setting. The hero player sees this and doesn’t like it is absolutely powerless to stop the villain player unless the villain player accepts a duel or that we in some other way force a confrontation on both players to resolve the course of action. PvP in all forms must and always be optional and never make the player feel forced they must resort to it to resolve a difference. Otherwise players aren’t able to properly play a villain because they can’t actually thwart or affect hero players and players can’t properly play a hero because they can never thwart or affect villains. The only way to provide that sort of action is in PvP.
Event the "let me flag myself" system doesn't prevent this as there only those flagged can engage and others can't and therefore on the same instance a player who isn't flagged can do things that another player disagrees with and is still powerless to stop it. Or others for forced to contend with it as players do tricky things like use the environment (npcs) to cause trouble for opposing alignments which is yet a form of pvp or even griefing if the other player doesn't want to be bothered in that way.

The simple answer to all this handwaving is "So what?"

Yes we can agree on the basic premise that PvP should be 100% optional in all cases. But let's go back to your hypothetical of a villain doing something bad and a hero who can only respond if PvP is agreed to by both parties. If both parties agree to PvP then fine. But if one or the other doesn't then too bad, period. Sure this might mean the villain could get away with doing evil things by refusing to accept the hero's challenge to duel, but again who cares? The way actions are "regulated" in PvE is via NPC controls. Sure the PC villain might not be able to be stopped by the PC hero because he refuses to enter into PvP, but if there are plenty of NPC cops walking around the PC villains will still have to think twice about running amock. Problem solved.

Stop worrying about "players being powerless to affect what other players are doing". I think that is the key problem that's led you so far astray from what you should be focusing on here.

As I said before I think you have unfortunately travelled down a very ugly path in terms of how you think players of differing alignments should interact with each other. Your worldview will lead to having the playerbase once again isolated/segregated into arbitrary instances which hurts the overall environment of the game world. Please reconsider what you're doing with this - I sadly have very little interest in playing in the kind of game you're talking about here.

CoH player from April 25, 2004 to November 30, 2012

Kiyori Anoyui
Kiyori Anoyui's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 months 2 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/10/2013 - 11:03
I once again agree with

I once again agree with Lothic. Not everyone is a hero(in the true sense), they may have good moral alignment but they don't feel the need to save the cops. How many people in the world have the ability to stop something from happening or at least help but just walk on by. If there is someone who sees this happening and wants to be the "hero", those are the people who want to PvP anyways. In shows villains get away with plenty of crimes and attacks on people before running into that One Person that is not okay with their actions and wants to take them down.

As Lothic said you either do a spectrum and have everyone together or split them up and call them good/bad. NCSoft made rogue to try and get away from the paradigms.

I believe this should be more of a game of choices. You can save people, or you don't have to, it's up to you. It's all about what kind of person you want to be.

But at the same time in the grand scheme of things. A "villain" attacks a group of cops, what does that change, like real life, life moves on

The Carnival of Light in the Phoenix Rising
"We never lose our demons, we only learn to live above them." - The Ancient One

Avatar by lilshironeko

Tannim222
Tannim222's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 days 12 hours ago
Developer11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 01/16/2013 - 12:47
So what is not a simple

So what is not a simple answer at all. Its a poor excuse. A player with the desire to play the hero and feeling powerless to be the hero won't be encouraged to keep playing the hero if the game world constantly reminds them of the reality they can't make a difference. The same can be said of those that want to be the villain.

And nothing stops players from living in a world of pvp (once we get all the kinks worked out) if they want to have the kind of game play your apparently desire.

Players should be allowed to play heroes and know they are making a difference in the world.
Players should be allowed to play a villain and know they are making a difference in the world.
Players should be allowed to stop and fight one another and know they are making a differnce in the world.

All of those desires are valid and we hope to provide a way to experience all of them.


I don't use a nerf bat, I have a magic crowbar!
- Combat Mechanic -
Tech Team.
Kiyori Anoyui
Kiyori Anoyui's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 months 2 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/10/2013 - 11:03
Tannim222 wrote:
Tannim222 wrote:

So what is not a simple answer at all. Its a poor excuse. A player with the desire to play the hero and feeling powerless to be the hero won't be encouraged to keep playing the hero if the game world constantly reminds them of the reality they can't make a difference. The same can be said of those that want to be the villain.
And nothing stops players from living in a world of pvp (once we get all the kinks worked out) if they want to have the kind of game play your apparently desire.
Players should be allowed to play heroes and know they are making a difference in the world.
Players should be allowed to play a villain and know they are making a difference in the world.
Players should be allowed to stop and fight one another and know they are making a differnce in the world.
All of those desires are valid and we hope to provide a way to experience all of them.

So does this mean that you don't ever switch instances but you just move across the spectrum of a hero if you choose at the beginning that you want to be a hero?

The Carnival of Light in the Phoenix Rising
"We never lose our demons, we only learn to live above them." - The Ancient One

Avatar by lilshironeko

Nina Guardian
Nina Guardian's picture
Offline
Last seen: 5 years 1 day ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/10/2013 - 20:29
I can't stress how very mush

I can't stress how very much I agree with Lothic here. As she says, if I see a player fighting the police and can't do anything about it, so what? Do you know how many times I flew right past some poor civilian getting sacrificed to demons not 20 feet away from a sidewalk that people were walking down? I didn't let that bother me, why should the other?

So, say I'm flying by and I see Captain Tightpants fighting cops? I click on him and see that he has his PVP flag turned off. I also see he has a reputation for Low Law, High Honor and High Violence. So, I can just go about my business, OR I could land nearby and ask him why he's fighting those cops. He responds that these are the corrupt cops who killed his brother and framed him. Instant RP possibilities!

No disrespect Tannim, but your way of doing this just ruins TONS of interesting possibilities and forces us backward rather than forward.

I hope, hope, HOPE you all can rethink this.

Seriously, I am not a happy Nina.

Phoenix Rising's Model Citizen

Kiyori Anoyui
Kiyori Anoyui's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 months 2 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/10/2013 - 11:03
If Nina's not happy, nobodies

If Nina's not happy, nobodies happy :(

The Carnival of Light in the Phoenix Rising
"We never lose our demons, we only learn to live above them." - The Ancient One

Avatar by lilshironeko

Fireheart
Fireheart's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 2 weeks ago
11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/05/2013 - 13:45
It's possible that we're

It's possible that we're stuck in an "even the Devs don't quite know how this is going to work out" situation.

Be Well!
Fireheart

Lothic
Lothic's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 3 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/02/2013 - 00:27
Tannim222 wrote:
Tannim222 wrote:

So what is not a simple answer at all. Its a poor excuse. A player with the desire to play the hero and feeling powerless to be the hero won't be encouraged to keep playing the hero if the game world constantly reminds them of the reality they can't make a difference. The same can be said of those that want to be the villain.
And nothing stops players from living in a world of pvp (once we get all the kinks worked out) if they want to have the kind of game play your apparently desire.
Players should be allowed to play heroes and know they are making a difference in the world.
Players should be allowed to play a villain and know they are making a difference in the world.
Players should be allowed to stop and fight one another and know they are making a differnce in the world.
All of those desires are valid and we hope to provide a way to experience all of them.

You have clearly drunk the Kool-Aid over this nonsense about "players feeling impotent to engage in PvP when other players don't want to". That core nugget of concern on your part has colored your views on this entire game in a way that I didn’t even imagine was possible until this thread came up.

I can accept your self-proclaimed desire of making sure players have a sense of being able to "make a difference in the world". But I'll have to say you're proposed methods to achieve that are absolutely simple-minded and borderline ridiculous. I am frankly amazed that I didn't realize just how off the tracks your "solution" to all this really seems to be.

For both our sake's I hope I’m completely and utterly wrong about all this, but I’m actually getting pretty scared that I'm not...

CoH player from April 25, 2004 to November 30, 2012

Nina Guardian
Nina Guardian's picture
Offline
Last seen: 5 years 1 day ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/10/2013 - 20:29
You and me and a bunch of

You and me and a bunch of others it seems Lothic :(

Phoenix Rising's Model Citizen

Tannim222
Tannim222's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 days 12 hours ago
Developer11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 01/16/2013 - 12:47
Nina Guardian wrote:
Nina Guardian wrote:

I can't stress how very much I agree with Lothic here. As she says, if I see a player fighting the police and can't do anything about it, so what? Do you know how many times I flew right past some poor civilian getting sacrificed to demons not 20 feet away from a sidewalk that people were walking down? I didn't let that bother me, why should the other?
So, say I'm flying by and I see Captain Tightpants fighting cops? I click on him and see that he has his PVP flag turned off. I also see he has a reputation for Low Law, High Honor and High Violence. So, I can just go about my business, OR I could land nearby and ask him why he's fighting those cops. He responds that these are the corrupt cops who killed his brother and framed him. Instant RP possibilities!
No disrespect Tannim, but your way of doing this just ruins TONS of interesting possibilities and forces us backward rather than forward.
I hope, hope, HOPE you all can rethink this.
Seriously, I am not a happy Nina.

Point being if you choose to not turn a blind eye toward something happening, you can do something about it.

More to the point, if you're actions has an effect in the world you are involved with, and someone else's actions can negatively impact the world you are a part of, that is a form of PvP even if it is PvEvP.

And that is not saying the desire to be in a world where you can stop and fight the bad guy or the good guy is a bad thing to want.

We want to provide that choice.
We also want to provie the choice where you don't have to deal with those changes and can be the hero or be the bad guy.


I don't use a nerf bat, I have a magic crowbar!
- Combat Mechanic -
Tech Team.
Kiyori Anoyui
Kiyori Anoyui's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 months 2 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/10/2013 - 11:03
This seems to be a very large

This seems to be a concern that needs more refining before getting too deep into any path as the clock is ticking....

You can look at PvP like regular monsters all over the map.

Like Nina said, how many groups of baddies beating the snot out of civilians did we all fly over? Ya they may have been low level baddies but there were still civilians in harm that we just said, "eh"

Why should players attacking citizens be any different than monsters attacking citizens?

The Carnival of Light in the Phoenix Rising
"We never lose our demons, we only learn to live above them." - The Ancient One

Avatar by lilshironeko

Tannim222
Tannim222's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 days 12 hours ago
Developer11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 01/16/2013 - 12:47
Kiyori Anoyui wrote:
Kiyori Anoyui wrote:

This seems to be a concern that needs more refining before getting too deep into any path as the clock is ticking....
You can look at PvP like regular monsters all over the map.
Like Nina said, how many groups of baddies beating the snot out of civilians did we all fly over? Ya they may have been low level baddies but there were still civilians in harm that we just said, "eh"
Why should players attacking citizens be any different than monsters attacking citizens?

The first example you are making a choice, to act or not to act.
The other the choice has been made for you, you cannot act unless you both agree to PvP.

And in the second example, if someone's actions has an actual change in the world?

This is why we seek to provide options for what type of game you desire to play, and in part your decisions for your character plays out in what type of game you are involved with.

Also, for the record, this isn't "my idea" or "my plan". These plans were laid out before I even joined the team. I had my own ideas about how we should handle all of this even when I first joined on board. Ideas which were quickly shot down because of the road map already being laid out.


I don't use a nerf bat, I have a magic crowbar!
- Combat Mechanic -
Tech Team.
Lothic
Lothic's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 3 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/02/2013 - 00:27
Tannim222 wrote:
Tannim222 wrote:

Nina Guardian wrote:
I can't stress how very much I agree with Lothic here. As she says, if I see a player fighting the police and can't do anything about it, so what? Do you know how many times I flew right past some poor civilian getting sacrificed to demons not 20 feet away from a sidewalk that people were walking down? I didn't let that bother me, why should the other?
So, say I'm flying by and I see Captain Tightpants fighting cops? I click on him and see that he has his PVP flag turned off. I also see he has a reputation for Low Law, High Honor and High Violence. So, I can just go about my business, OR I could land nearby and ask him why he's fighting those cops. He responds that these are the corrupt cops who killed his brother and framed him. Instant RP possibilities!
No disrespect Tannim, but your way of doing this just ruins TONS of interesting possibilities and forces us backward rather than forward.
I hope, hope, HOPE you all can rethink this.
Seriously, I am not a happy Nina.

Point being if you choose to not turn a blind eye toward something happening, you can do something about it.
More to the point, if you're actions has an effect in the world you are involved with, and someone else's actions can negatively impact the world you are a part of, that is a form of PvP even if it is PvEvP.
And that is not saying the desire to be in a world where you can stop and fight the bad guy or the good guy is a bad thing to want.
We want to provide that choice.
We also want to provie the choice where you don't have to deal with those changes and can be the hero or be the bad guy.

Any world where I'm forced to be a "hero" or a "villain" has absolutely no true sense of "grey" where alignment is concerned. You're not providing CHOICE at all. Can't you see that?

And on the question of CHOICE it should be a CHOICE if I want to engage in mutual PvP with anyone in this game. If I'm a hero and the naughty villain doesn't want to PvP with me that's his/her CHOICE. The PvP minded hero is just going to have to be SHIT OUT OF LUCK. Too bad, so sad. Your "solution" to frustrated PvPers is to arbitrarily SEPARATE players along lines that DON'T EVEN MAKE LOGICAL SENSE for a true multi-axis alignment system.

Your foundation is faulty and naturally the entire house of cards you've built on top of it is faulty as well. Please reconsider what you're doing here for the love of anything holy you believe in.

CoH player from April 25, 2004 to November 30, 2012

Nina Guardian
Nina Guardian's picture
Offline
Last seen: 5 years 1 day ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/10/2013 - 20:29
Oh My Gawd.

Oh My Gawd.

So, this is it, it's set in stone?

My emotional investment in this project just got cut in half.

You keep on saying you are giving us choices. Yes, exactly ONE choice. Blue or Red. That's it. And taking away literally hundreds of other choices and role playing possibilities.

Phoenix Rising's Model Citizen

Lothic
Lothic's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 3 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/02/2013 - 00:27
Tannim222 wrote:
Tannim222 wrote:

Also, for the record, this isn't "my idea" or "my plan". These plans were laid out before I even joined the team. I had my own ideas about how we should handle all of this even when I first joined on board. Ideas which were quickly shot down because of the road map already being laid out.

Good god you mean this scheme has been in the works for that long and we're only now hearing about this?

I still find it absolutely amazing that we weren't aware of all this until today.

I sit here absolutely boggling in disbelief...

CoH player from April 25, 2004 to November 30, 2012

Kiyori Anoyui
Kiyori Anoyui's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 months 2 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/10/2013 - 11:03
i'm in full agreement with

I'm in full agreement with Nina and Lothic, the whole CHOICE and FUN area of the game was that you're all going into one world making any decision you want and getting to see the variation of how the choices affected you and others around you and how different the world could be!

I too am a little surprised that this hasn't been a more open and discussed detail of development.

The Carnival of Light in the Phoenix Rising
"We never lose our demons, we only learn to live above them." - The Ancient One

Avatar by lilshironeko

Brighellac
Offline
Last seen: 7 years 3 months ago
11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 01/17/2015 - 00:24
/em popcorn

/em popcorn

Keep spinning, Lothic ...this is funny

JayBezz
JayBezz's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 years 8 months ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/08/2013 - 14:54
I add my name to the list of

I add my name to the list of unhappy persons. I have friends who are not going to play with the same ideal as me that I'd still like to interact with. In PvE I want the chance to talk with them, see their strength and perhaps make a new frenemy (social friend). In PvP (when turned on) I want players to have the option to actually engage in combat with each other should they choose to.

I cannot stress how important it is (especially to the population of people playing dedicated villains which tends to be low) that they get to be seen and not separated from the general population. Also I think it important on those same lines of reasoning to add a third class of alignment to try to split the numbers of "Heroes" into another population to help even out numbers.

PvP should ALWAYS be optional. On this we agree.. But I do not think opposing players should be invisible and marginalized.

Crowd Control Enthusiast

Lothic
Lothic's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 3 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/02/2013 - 00:27
Brighellac wrote:
Brighellac wrote:

/em popcorn
Keep spinning, Lothic ...this is funny

No, it's sad in ways I can't even get into here.

For what it's worth I'll apologize to Tannim222 now for directing my hatred of this towards him in any personal way. If it's true all of this was established before he started working for MWM then it's not technically his fault for "towing the company line".

But I will not back down from my firm stance that this has fundamentally damaged my enthusiasm for the game. Oh I'm sure I'll still play it and I may even enjoy it, but now I'll be forced to wonder how cool the game could have actually been if more sensible decisions had been made.

CoH player from April 25, 2004 to November 30, 2012

Lutan
Lutan's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 2 months ago
11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 02/02/2014 - 15:08
On one side, there is a

On one side, there is a divide, heros and villains can not interact with each other, but are also not bothered by each others actions. And there is a way out, the PvP layer of the game. Where you can interact and fight.

On the other, there is still some divide, since you can see the villain, but you probably are still unable to team up with him and can not really interact with him much, but for that little less of a divide, you have to live with everything the other side does, including possibly turning the city into ruins or into a corrupt shadow of itself. Or a pseudo-utopia full of mind control- zombies.

Even though I do not like PvP much, I think I prefer the first option. A solution that works for everyone, without a divide somewhere will probably be next to impossible.

And furthermore, I have read about that switching sides will be possible. Maybe not from start, but it will be there eventually.

Kiyori Anoyui
Kiyori Anoyui's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 months 2 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/10/2013 - 11:03
I'm pretty lax so I'm usually

I'm pretty lax so I'm usually fine with whatever happens but I will also be always wondering how cool it would have been to be among heroes when I'm actually a villain or vica versa, knowing that I have the power and options to be whoever I wanted. Getting out of a mission with other heroes to take down one of my enemies(the whole a enemy of my enemy is my friend) then going to join up with a bunch of villains to take down some of the coppers

The Carnival of Light in the Phoenix Rising
"We never lose our demons, we only learn to live above them." - The Ancient One

Avatar by lilshironeko

Brutum
Brutum's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 years 2 months ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/13/2013 - 19:18
I think this is something

I think this is something that should have been brought up or talked about a long time ago.

Puny Heroes.

Lothic
Lothic's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 3 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/02/2013 - 00:27
Lutan wrote:
Lutan wrote:

On one side, there is a divide, heros and villains can not interact with each other, but are also not bothered by each others actions. And there is a way out, the PvP layer of the game. Where you can interact and fight.
On the other, there is still some divide, since you can see the villain, but you probably are still unable to team up with him and can not really interact with him much, but for that little less of a divide, you have to live with everything the other side does, including possibly turning the city into ruins or into a corrupt shadow of itself. Or a pseudo-utopia full of mind control- zombies.
Even though I do not like PvP much, I think I prefer the first option. A solution that works for everyone, without a divide somewhere will probably be next to impossible.
And furthermore, I have read about that switching sides will be possible. Maybe not from start, but it will be there eventually.

We had the chance to have an open "alignment spectrum" based game full of options for teaming and PvP as we players saw fit. Now we have the segregated binary game of CoH/CoV circa 2005 with no alignment variations and a strict "red and blue side" that are going to be using the same exact maps. From those elements alone we have a game on our hands that has taken so many steps backward it's almost pathetic.

CoH player from April 25, 2004 to November 30, 2012

Nina Guardian
Nina Guardian's picture
Offline
Last seen: 5 years 1 day ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/10/2013 - 20:29
No Lutan. respectively, No. I

No Lutan. respectively, No. I don't like PVP. I don't want to do it. It's not fun for me.

I do, however, want to interact with everyone. Blue, Red, Purple, whatever. On the Kickstarter forums, a redside player and I joked about roleplaying that I'm dating his secret ID, not knowing that he's actually a villain. That would have been fun. Now, it finally reveled to us that he and I will never even know the other exists. Because, as long as the game is concerned, we don't exist in the same world. That CHOICE and everything that goes with it has bee removed. And it's not Tannim fault that my choices have been removed. His bosses decided that long ago and decided no to tell us.

Sigh. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe the majority of players will actually prefer this lack of choice. Like Lothic, I'll still play. I'll half-heartedly finish my Mogul design, now knowing that I'll never get to see if half the players like it or not.

I was so excited about living in Titan City. Now I know that there are actually 2 of them. I guess I'll stay on the lookout for a better game. One that gives me choices.

Separate but Equal just doesn't work.

Phoenix Rising's Model Citizen

Tannim222
Tannim222's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 days 12 hours ago
Developer11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 01/16/2013 - 12:47
JayBezz wrote:
JayBezz wrote:

I add my name to the list of unhappy persons. I have friends who are not going to play with the same ideal as me that I'd still like to interact with. In PvE I want the chance to talk with them, see their strength and perhaps make a new frenemy (social friend). In PvP (when turned on) I want players to have the option to actually engage in combat with each other should they choose to.
I cannot stress how important it is (especially to the population of people playing dedicated villains which tends to be low) that they get to be seen and not separated from the general population. Also I think it important on those same lines of reasoning to add a third class of alignment to try to split the numbers of "Heroes" into another population to help even out numbers.
PvP should ALWAYS be optional. On this we agree.. But I do not think opposing players should be invisible and marginalized.

There should be places for those of opposing views to interact in...safety. And nothing should prevent being able to chat with friends regardless of alignment.

And having a separate PvP instance of the game has always been part of the plan. Even as far back as the kickstarter when the server design was brought up.

What I feel has happened, and again I was subject to this myself, was that the topic of a mega-server that provides for the entire population is what caught people's attention and the part about being able to set up multiple instances (phases) of every map in the game flew under people's radar except for when thinking purely along the lines of population numbers.

The issue comes with interaction. Player choices interacting with the environment causing changes to occur.

Player choices that can affect who and what other players can interact with.

If a player is attacking a faction that the other player needs to interact with and they are powerless to do anything about it is not helpful to any game design.

Placing layers of what might trigger PvP, setting flags of PvP, and also dealing with the possibility that players could use the environment to affect another players adds multiple layers of complexity to the game design.

The alignment system is about choices and how they affect the stories your character is involved with. Those stories could have an impact on your character's world view.

While there is a lot of grey area between the "boy scout do-gooder" and "ruthless criminal" that players may traverse, at some point enough choices could lead down a road where you are playing the kind of character you want to play in a world that character is a part of based on their choices.


I don't use a nerf bat, I have a magic crowbar!
- Combat Mechanic -
Tech Team.
Kiyori Anoyui
Kiyori Anoyui's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 months 2 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/10/2013 - 11:03
I believe a big issue is that

I believe a big issue is that we are referring to them only as heroes or villains. I really don't see why "heroes" and "villains" can't team up. Now that goes to a certain extent, so going back to earlier when we were talking about the 5 layer spectrum of Grey.

You could have a system where you can only team with people who are within a range of each other,

Say if it were a 5 scale system

1. Low
2. Mid-Low
3. Middle
4.Mid-High
5. High

You could team with people who are 2-4 because you are still in a grey enough area where moral alignment isn't too discernible. If you are all the way villain(1) then you "could" make it so you can team with them but for most purposes a true, take no prisoners "villain" wouldn't team with a true "hero"(5) wouldn't usually want to team with a true villain

As the 3 range goes you could also team 3-5 and 1-3

This range and scale can change, but I think it's a pretty easy system to allow everyone to being the same instance

The Carnival of Light in the Phoenix Rising
"We never lose our demons, we only learn to live above them." - The Ancient One

Avatar by lilshironeko

Izzy
Izzy's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 years 5 months ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/09/2013 - 11:09
I'm gonna' wait for someone

I thought a PC's standing was going to be Hidden so players didn't know what you DID, or where you Stand.
NPC's see it though.

I'm gonna' wait for someone else from MWM to set me straight. ;D

Brutum
Brutum's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 years 2 months ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/13/2013 - 19:18
For the sake of the game I

For the sake of the game I hope that the team will still listen to people about this problem. Especially if it hasn't been brought up and if the majority of backers are against it (or not). Almost definitely to me sounds like it will make maps and the game emptier, give morality less true meaning and in general just gives into a whinier crowd.... I'll withhold further thought on this until this is discussed more.

Puny Heroes.

JayBezz
JayBezz's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 years 8 months ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/08/2013 - 14:54
Tannim, I understand the MWM

Tannim, I understand the MWM position. I just feel strongly that the position should change.

It's more important to me (and in my opinion to the game) that I be able to be social and interact with players than it is for me to see the game change because of my character defeated an enemy faction. So i defeated the Rooks.. doesn't mean other players aren't going to come through and do the exact same thing.

I don't want to be on a PvP only server/instance.
I dont want to be separated from my friends AT ALL.

This is a major design flaw. I would like to exaggerate it for effect but I shouldn't need to.. separating the players like this is bad, Bad, BAD.

I hope MWM listens to those most affected (those who PvP) and doesn't treat their gameplay as second-class. If you don't want to PvP in the PvE world, simply stay un-flagged. No one will be able to bother you. If for some reason their very presence bothers you, then simply /ignore the player.

- -

The issues you bring up are handled simply in other games. Certain NPCs are given immunity and guards that are too strong (warning then defeating those who are unfriendly). Why the City of Titans design has not reached this level of sophistication I do not know.

Crowd Control Enthusiast

Kiyori Anoyui
Kiyori Anoyui's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 months 2 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/10/2013 - 11:03
Tannim222, I don't think the

Tannim222, I don't think anything flew under the radar, the information wasn't set in stone info and the info that was given was fairly vague according to Moral Alignment, so if info is open to interpretation and it is involving Moral Alignment i would say the logical progression of user base thought process would be that you could start neutral with all other players and go one way or another in the same "world". That's just my opinion though

The Carnival of Light in the Phoenix Rising
"We never lose our demons, we only learn to live above them." - The Ancient One

Avatar by lilshironeko

Redlynne
Redlynne's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 day 14 hours ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/28/2013 - 21:15
I wanted an Alignment system

I wanted an Alignment system that created an emergent "my part of town" dynamic that would be different for different PCs. Depending on what one's Alignment settings were on the three axes (Honor, Law, Peace), your PC would consider different parts of the city to be "home turf" for you. The expectation I had was that there would be "buffer zones" around these places and that the majority of the city would be hostile territory (ripe for Street Sweeping, essentially).

I even came up with a very simple 2 out of 3 matches way of making that happen in ways that made sense, letting different parts of the city have a different "feel" to them, giving them a different "cast" and character so that the different neighborhoods aren't all the same for everyone.

I even came up with the notion of making some parts of the city "Control Points" which can have varying Alignments associated with them such that the actions of Players can directly (if temporarily) influence the game world such that the city isn't STATIC in terms of its flavor and fortunes, but rather an "always in motion" set of shifting alliances, loyalties, turf wars and crack ups which Players could participate in influencing the outcome of.

I thought we could all ... heroes and villains ... live in the SAME CITY ... instead of living in our own copied "versions" of the city.

I hate to say it, but I'm going to have to play TheMightyPaladin card here on you Tannim222.

What you are saying has dealt a severe blow to my confidence in the game as a fun place to play.

Oh and I guess that means you "hate" (or at least, reject) my idea of using the 1-5 scale for Alignment matching. :(


Verbogeny is one of many pleasurettes afforded a creatific thinkerizer.
Brutum
Brutum's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 years 2 months ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/13/2013 - 19:18
I had something along those

I had something along those lines in mind. It is definitely not something that should be too insane to do. I don't know how I can stress how much this topic deserves to be discussed/worked on with the backers/general player base but it needs to be badly haha.

Puny Heroes.

Kiyori Anoyui
Kiyori Anoyui's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 months 2 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/10/2013 - 11:03
Redlynne wrote:
Redlynne wrote:

I wanted an Alignment system that created an emergent "my part of town" dynamic that would be different for different PCs. Depending on what one's Alignment settings were on the three axes (Honor, Law, Peace), your PC would consider different parts of the city to be "home turf" for you. The expectation I had was that there would be "buffer zones" around these places and that the majority of the city would be hostile territory (ripe for Street Sweeping, essentially).
I even came up with a very simple 2 out of 3 matches way of making that happen in ways that made sense, letting different parts of the city have a different "feel" to them, giving them a different "cast" and character so that the different neighborhoods aren't all the same for everyone.
I even came up with the notion of making some parts of the city "Control Points" which can have varying Alignments associated with them such that the actions of Players can directly (if temporarily) influence the game world such that the city isn't STATIC in terms of its flavor and fortunes, but rather an "always in motion" set of shifting alliances, loyalties, turf wars and crack ups which Players could participate in influencing the outcome of.
I thought we could all ... heroes and villains ... live in the SAME CITY ... instead of living in our own copied "versions" of the city.
I hate to say it, but I'm going to have to play TheMightyPaladin card here on you Tannim222.
What you are saying has dealt a severe blow to my confidence in the game as a fun place to play.
Oh and I guess that means you "hate" (or at least, reject) my idea of using the 1-5 scale for Alignment matching. :(

+1111111

The Carnival of Light in the Phoenix Rising
"We never lose our demons, we only learn to live above them." - The Ancient One

Avatar by lilshironeko

Foradain
Foradain's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 2 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/25/2013 - 21:06
I think we have some people

I think we have some people talking past each other here.

Tannim, please correct me if I have this wrong: The separate shards you refer to are for Open PvP or Non-Open PVP, yes? Not for Hero or Villain?

If that's right, then those who don't ever want to engage in random PvP can stay in the non-PvP shards, and those who sometimes want to can shift between shards at will (although, presumably not while in combat ^_^) and those who never want to be immune to PvP can stay in the PvP shard. People can ignore what other PCs are doing, or interact with them non-violently, or if they both agree to go PvP then they can duke it out...

Foradain, Mage of Phoenix Rising.
Foradain's Character Conclave
.
Avatar courtesy of Satellite9 Irezoomie

Izzy
Izzy's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 years 5 months ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/09/2013 - 11:09
Hmm... so if im playing a

Hmm... so if im playing a Villain, and i want to increase my Villain Alignment, and go attack some Citizens...
...does it mean Hero PC can start to grief me and slow my progress down? I'd Be PISSSED! :P

Other Heroes should not be able to stop me from doing bad in the GOOD'er part of town (NPC Cops will come)... but PC Heroes can stop NPC villains in the other BAD'er part of town. ;)

Lothic
Lothic's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 3 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/02/2013 - 00:27
Foradain wrote:
Foradain wrote:

Tannim, please correct me if I have this wrong: The separate shards you refer to are for Open PvP or Non-Open PVP, yes? Not for Hero or Villain?

No it pretty much sounds like they are forcing us back to strict "red side" and "blue side" divisions (via phasing technology) with the added twist of reusing the same maps for both so we wouldn't even have the benefit of having unique red and blue zones. This "solution" doesn't even address how they'll handle PvP one way or another.

CoH player from April 25, 2004 to November 30, 2012

Redlynne
Redlynne's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 day 14 hours ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/28/2013 - 21:15
Tannim222 wrote:
Tannim222 wrote:

If a player is attacking a faction that the other player needs to interact with and they are powerless to do anything about it is not helpful to any game design.

(broadcast chat)

Player 1: Hey! There's a bunch of villains invading City Hall in Atlas Park 1 and the place is a war zone! I can't get in!
Player 2: Did you try switching to Atlas Park 2?
Player 1: Uh, no. I didn't know I could do that. What do I do?

(snip instance switching instructions)

Player 1: Oh hey! There aren't any villains in Atlas Park 2 and I can get to all the NPCs I needed to but couldn't before! Thanks!
Player 2: No problem.

Look, Tannim, if there's some sort of villain vs hero "raid" going on into "enemy" territory, the easiest way to deal with it on a mega-server is to just switch to a different instance of the city. Don't like that PC punk punching the lights out of your Contact? Switch to a different instance of the city and your Contact will probably be there, unharmed, with no naughty villain around punching his lights out.

And not to put too fine a point on things, but if you're really serious about having PvP "be a thing" all you'd need to do is make "instance zero" the PvP instance of the city and let the carnage commence. Make the right/permission to enter "instance zero" of the city in order to PvP be something purchased using Stars (I'm thinking something "cheap" like 100-200 Stars per month) and then let people figure out for themselves if they REALLY want to punch the lights out of another Player. Set things up such that any sort of "PvP Engaged" with another Player will automatically transfer both PCs to "instance zero" and call it a day.

So I suppose my message is to whoever decided the system you've been talking about Tannim would be this:

"He's intelligent, but not experienced. His pattern indicates ... two dimensional thinking."
- Spock, The Wrath of Khan

I think you (Missing Worlds Media) have *SERIOUSLY* misjudged where your Players want the "fault lines" of segregation to be.

PvE / PvP segregation: okay.
Hero / Villain segregation: report for medical examination.


Verbogeny is one of many pleasurettes afforded a creatific thinkerizer.
Tannim222
Tannim222's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 days 12 hours ago
Developer11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 01/16/2013 - 12:47
That is what a pvp instance

That is what a pvp instance is for Red, pvp.


I don't use a nerf bat, I have a magic crowbar!
- Combat Mechanic -
Tech Team.
Kiyori Anoyui
Kiyori Anoyui's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 months 2 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/10/2013 - 11:03
Foradain wrote:
Foradain wrote:

I think we have some people talking past each other here.
Tannim, please correct me if I have this wrong: The separate shards you refer to are for Open PvP or Non-Open PVP, yes? Not for Hero or Villain?
If that's right, then those who don't ever want to engage in random PvP can stay in the non-PvP shards, and those who sometimes want to can shift between shards at will (although, presumably not while in combat ^_^) and those who never want to be immune to PvP can stay in the PvP shard. People can ignore what other PCs are doing, or interact with them non-violently, or if they both agree to go PvP then they can duke it out...

Ya, when this issue came up we were only talking of hero/villain segragation so if it was the case of only talking of PVP then there has definitely been a fallout in communication

The Carnival of Light in the Phoenix Rising
"We never lose our demons, we only learn to live above them." - The Ancient One

Avatar by lilshironeko

Lutan
Lutan's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 2 months ago
11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 02/02/2014 - 15:08
All right. So the question

All right. So the question that needs to be answered clearly is:

When I am in the PvE instance, will I see heroes while I play a villain?

Redlynne
Redlynne's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 day 14 hours ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/28/2013 - 21:15
Kiyori Anoyui wrote:
Kiyori Anoyui wrote:

Redlynne wrote:
{snippity}
Oh and I guess that means you "hate" (or at least, reject) my idea of using the 1-5 scale for Alignment matching. :(

+1111111

Don't worry, Kiyori ... Tannim doesn't like my idea for depth control when using Teleport or airbursting grenades without needing to resort to using line of sight collision with surfaces or target locks either.

Ah well ... it does seem to be my lot in life to toil in futility ...


Verbogeny is one of many pleasurettes afforded a creatific thinkerizer.
Lothic
Lothic's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 3 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/02/2013 - 00:27
Lutan wrote:
Lutan wrote:

All right. So the question that needs to be answered clearly is:
When I am in the PvE instance, will I see heroes while I play a villain?

According to Tannim222 no, you won't. Again they want to essentially reestablish the concepts of "red side" and "blue side" but instead of doing that with dedicated red and blue zones they'll do it by having different "phases" on their mega-server. The net effect is the same - a divided playerbase and unrealistic gameplay all in service to a silly idea about keeping frustrated PvPers happy in some convoluted way.

I've concluded the key problem here is that the Devs of CoT are still hanging on to the binary hero/villain paradigm. If they would just let that go and let their multi-axis alignment system take its place they would realize that dividing ANYTHING on hero/villain lines is fundamentally silly and counter-productive. CoH for its part was slowly learning that lesson in its final years. It appears that the folks at MWM have completely misunderstood the fundamental shift in thinking that was taking place in that game and gone back to square one, or maybe even "square negative 1" if that's even possible.

CoH player from April 25, 2004 to November 30, 2012

Brutum
Brutum's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 years 2 months ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/13/2013 - 19:18
That doesn't really help

That doesn't really help answer any of the huge amount of issues being brought up about moralities worth and staleness from copy and pasted hero/villain map versions on top of emptiness from lack of people though. Things not directly associated with the act of PvP.

Puny Heroes.

Kiyori Anoyui
Kiyori Anoyui's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 months 2 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/10/2013 - 11:03
Agreed, there are three very

Agreed, there are three very big issues with morality that I think needs answered separately.

How will morality effect anything if you are in separate instances, will it still be a "turf" war where you have nice areas and hostile areas or will it be there are bad people everywhere in regards to your morality and you always have to be on guard?

How would morality effect you if you were in the same city?

And then the question of PVP

The Carnival of Light in the Phoenix Rising
"We never lose our demons, we only learn to live above them." - The Ancient One

Avatar by lilshironeko

Tannim222
Tannim222's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 days 12 hours ago
Developer11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 01/16/2013 - 12:47
I'll leave it at this:

I'll leave it at this:
As a true blue hero (the opposite end of the total spectrum here), a player should not have to experience a PC villain attacking NPCs and be helpless to do anything about it.
If I'm not a true blue hero but let's say a "little dirty" I may decide to deal with the seedy, grimy world.
If I'm not a true red criminal but let's say "a little clean" I may decide to deal with the brighter world.

As a true red ciminatl (the opposite end of the toal spectrum here), a player should not have to experience a PC hero attacking NPCs and be helpless to do anything about it.
If both types of players want to do something about it, there should be a place for that as well.

Requiring that pve players leave the zone because players decide to activate pvp is not a solution. The solution is there should be a PvE place where players get to play the way that they want and a PvP place where players can play that way.

Your choices for your character dicate the kind of world you decide to play in. It is in itself pretty simple.


I don't use a nerf bat, I have a magic crowbar!
- Combat Mechanic -
Tech Team.
Lutan
Lutan's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 2 months ago
11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 02/02/2014 - 15:08
I try to put this into CoH

I try to put this into CoH terms, to get a better grasp at it.
If I play a Hero, I can see Vigilantes and Scoundrels, but no Villains.
If I play a Vigilante or Scoundrel, I can see everyone.
And if I play a Villain, I can see Vigilantes and Scoundrels, but no Heros.

Except of course in social hubs like our equivalent of the Pocket D.
Correct?

Nina Guardian
Nina Guardian's picture
Offline
Last seen: 5 years 1 day ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/10/2013 - 20:29
Tannim, I'm not trying to

Tannim, I'm not trying to argue with you, mainly because it serves no purpose. The decision was made long ago and it seems it's not going to change. But, when you say "Requiring that pve players leave the zone because players decide to activate pvp is not a solution." I just shake my head. I don't see anyone asking for that. If two or more people want to PVP, let them. I will just continue on my business.

It just seems that there are so many other ways this could have been done, but a decision was made maybe a year ago and we just weren't told about it. That's the frustrating part. Look at all the replies to Cyclop's initial question. We believed we were all going to be together. Now we hear (for the first time) that isn't true. We will be old fashioned Blue/Red segregation. Two City Halls, Two Mischief's Ascendants, Two Naughty Corners. But I will only be able to see one of them.

You say "Your choices for your character dicate the kind of world you decide to play in. It is in itself pretty simple".

I choose a world we all can be in. Together.

Separate is NOT equal.

Phoenix Rising's Model Citizen

JayBezz
JayBezz's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 years 8 months ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/08/2013 - 14:54
Nina Guardian wrote:
Nina Guardian wrote:

Tannim, I'm not trying to argue with you, mainly because it serves no purpose. The decision was made long ago and it seems it's not going to change. But, when you say "Requiring that pve players leave the zone because players decide to activate pvp is not a solution." I just shake my head. I don't see anyone asking for that. If two or more people want to PVP, let them. I will just continue on my business.
It just seems that there are so many other ways this could have been done, but a decision was made maybe a year ago and we just weren't told about it. That's the frustrating part. Look at all the replies to Cyclop's initial question. We believed we were all going to be together. Now we hear (for the first time) that isn't true. We will be old fashioned Blue/Red segregation. Two City Halls, Two Mischief's Ascendants, Two Naughty Corners. But I will only be able to see one of them.
You say "Your choices for your character dicate the kind of world you decide to play in. It is in itself pretty simple".
I choose a world we all can be in. Together.
Separate is NOT equal.

+1 (and +8 more for my guild) {And +50 more for my friends list who doesn't want to have to go to a specific instance type just to see/interact-with me}

- -

I hate Wildstar's PvP server, not because I hate PvP but because I am seperated by my friends on the "PvP Optional PvE Server". On the PvE Server I can simply mark myself eligible for PvP and enjoy a PvP experience. If/When I no longer want to be in PvP I simply unflag when out of combat.

The PvP servers (without the option to flag) are huge messes of angry players. So much so that most PvPers I know have gone to the PvE server and remain perma-flagged.. but IF they need to they can simply unflag.

Crowd Control Enthusiast

Tannim222
Tannim222's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 days 12 hours ago
Developer11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 01/16/2013 - 12:47
Lutan wrote:
Lutan wrote:

I try to put this into CoH terms, to get a better grasp at it.
If I play a Hero, I can see Vigilantes and Scoundrels, but no Villains.
If I play a Vigilante or Scoundrel, I can see everyone.
And if I play a Villain, I can see Vigilantes and Scoundrels, but no Heros.
Except of course in social hubs like our equivalent of the Pocket D.
Correct?

This is the main gist of things as it has been explained to me for pve.
Except for the addition of if you want to deal with the entire spectrum, that is what pvp is for.

Redlynne wrote:

Don't worry, Kiyori ... Tannim doesn't like my idea for depth control when using Teleport or airbursting grenades without needing to resort to using line of sight collision with surfaces or target locks either.
Ah well ... it does seem to be my lot in life to toil in futility ...

My personal opinion on those matters is irrelevant when there are design decisions that are made by those I essentially answer to have been made already.

So it is not that “I don’t like the ideas” but rather they are in conflict with decisions that have been already made that I abide by.

Nina Guardian wrote:

Tannim, I'm not trying to argue with you, mainly because it serves no purpose. The decision was made long ago and it seems it's not going to change. But, when you say "Requiring that pve players leave the zone because players decide to activate pvp is not a solution." I just shake my head. I don't see anyone asking for that. If two or more people want to PVP, let them. I will just continue on my business.
It just seems that there are so many other ways this could have been done, but a decision was made maybe a year ago and we just weren't told about it. That's the frustrating part. Look at all the replies to Cyclop's initial question. We believed we were all going to be together. Now we hear (for the first time) that isn't true. We will be old fashioned Blue/Red segregation. Two City Halls, Two Mischief's Ascendants, Two Naughty Corners. But I will only be able to see one of them.
You say "Your choices for your character dicate the kind of world you decide to play in. It is in itself pretty simple".
I choose a world we all can be in. Together.
Separate is NOT equal.

I understand the desire. I really do. Many of my very early discussions on the matter where in line with this sentiment.
However there are extraneous gameplay issues that are not easily resolved between faction reputation, alignment guiding initial perceptions of factions, player actions dictating changes in the world, and providing a space where players can play without being forced to put on blinders and pretend someone is opposing their favored factions and not having to resort to some form of pvp.


I don't use a nerf bat, I have a magic crowbar!
- Combat Mechanic -
Tech Team.
Kiyori Anoyui
Kiyori Anoyui's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 months 2 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/10/2013 - 11:03
To go a little bit further

To go a little bit further with Red's turf war idea, in order to make it more PvE friendly, it could be setup kindof like the board game risk, where the choices in missions have effects on a certain area around the missions. So if you decide to steal the drugs in the mission it take away points to the morality of the area, and if you turn the drugs in it adds points to the morality. And the higher or lower the morality is in the area give more mobs to either cops or baddies. So the missions will decide if areas become hostile or friendly. This creates an ever changing dynamic style of good and evil where you don't have to fight players to see that you are having influence on the game.

You finish a mission and you can literally see the effect your decisions have on he world. And the severity of the option can have a larger impact on the area. So if you take down the top villain in the mission the crime in that "range" could decrease dramatically, vica versa if you take down the top hero in a mission the crime goes up.

The Carnival of Light in the Phoenix Rising
"We never lose our demons, we only learn to live above them." - The Ancient One

Avatar by lilshironeko

Lothic
Lothic's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 3 weeks ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/02/2013 - 00:27
It might actually be easier

It might actually be easier for everyone (Devs and potential players alike) to approach this game not from the point of view of players playing "heroes" or "villains" but instead players playing "neutrals". No one is good, no one is bad, we're all just a bunch of players playing generic characters in a game.

Now with that setting established let's add the baby-step idea of an "alignment spectrum". Let's say you want your "neutral" character to generally be positive and do morally acceptable things. Sure why not? Let's say another person wants their character to do socially naughty things. That's fine too. Now remember this game doesn't have strictly defined heroes and villains, all it has is an alignment system that'll reflect that your character generally likes to do nice or nasty things.

See where I'm going with this?

Once you have a game that no longer relies on strict moral absolutes to divide players into two abitrary factions you're free to have a game that not only let's everyone play together in the same phase/instance but lets their alignment slide up and down the scales based on their actions, not on which hardwired "side" they started on. All these "neutral" players are free to interact with each other as they like.

Now here's where it gets really interesting: Let's say you want to play your neutral character in such a way that he's so positive and morally upstanding that he actually wants to go out of his way to "confront" other players who like to play their characters with a naughty mindset. If both of those player choose to engage in PvP then look what you have: heroes fighting villains. Eureka!

But let's say that the villain-like neutral character doesn't want to engage in PvP: Oh well, the hero-like character is simply going to be out of luck unless he decideds to go fight some NPC villains or go to a PvP-dedicated zone where other players ACTUALY WANT TO engage in in PvP. Problem solved. There's really no such thing as the "frustrated hero PvPer" (the cornerstone of the worldview that Tannim222 has proposed) because that PvPer can simply go somewhere where his PvP desires would be fulfilled. There is no required expectation that the villain-like character must face being attacked by the hero-like character because they are not strict hero or villain respectively to begin with.

Let me make sure you understand what I laid out here: THERE ARE NO HEROES AND NO VILLAINS IN THIS GAME. There's no pre-programmed, hardwired reason why any player must attack and/or interfere with another player unless they BOTH mutuallly agree to it. Again you're completely free to play your neutral character AS IF they were a strict hero or villain from the comic books. But just because you play that way doesn't mean another player must abide by your desire to reciprocate the traditional "heroes fight villains" memes. So once again in answer to Tannim222's concern that "heroes would be frustrated if they can't PvP with villains" I say "So what?" Who's to say the so-called villain the hero wants to fight isn't played by a player who actually considers his own neutral character to be a "hero" as well? Everything's relative.

Once you set yourself free from the reflexive comic book "hero vs. villian" paradigm you realize that people are just playing characters who can exist at any point along the alignment spectrum. The motivation for PvP then becomes completely optional because you no longer have "good guys fighting bad guys" but instead have "a random group guys fighting another random group of guys". If the players behind those guys want to "pretend" they are heroes fighting villains then so be it - that's a choice the players have made for themselves instead of the game making the choice for them.

I can only hope this post makes some sense to any passing Dev who reads it and gods willing will choose to consider it as an alternative to the current plans for CoT.

CoH player from April 25, 2004 to November 30, 2012

Pages