Announcements

Join the ongoing conversation on Discord: https://discord.gg/w6Tpkp2

Please read the current update for instructions on downloading the latest update. Players with Mac versions of the game will not be affected, but you will have a slightly longer wait for your version of the new maps. Please make a copy of your character folder before running the new update, just to make sure you don't lose any of your custom work.

It looks like we can give everyone a list of minimum specs for running City of Titans. Please keep in mind that this is 'for now' until we are able to add more graphics and other system refinements. Currently you will need :
Windows 10 or later required; no Intel integrated graphics like UHD, must have AMD or NVIDIA card or discrete chipset with 4Gb or more of VRAM
At least 16GB of main DRAM.
These stats may change as we continue to test.

To purchase your copy of the City of Titans Launcher, visit our store at https://store.missingworldsmedia.com/ A purchase of $50 or more will give you a link to download the Launcher for Windows or Mac based machines.

Bulletin Boards within SGs

9 posts / 0 new
Last post
Mike Skoog
Offline
Last seen: 5 years 4 months ago
kickstarter
Joined: 10/09/2013 - 16:52
Bulletin Boards within SGs

It would be neat for Super Groups to have their own internal bulletin so that:
1) SG's events can be posted.
2) For allied SGs, common events (like Task Force raids) can be posted on several friendly SGs' bulletin boards at the same time.

In either case, the people who can post to the bulletin board can be determined by a person rank with the SG. The Group's creators/managers determine what rank is required to post. Also, for posting on allied bulletin boards may require higher ranking within the SG.

Impulse King
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 4 months ago
11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/05/2013 - 18:55
I touched on this in the SG

I touched on this in the SG registrar thread briefly. The main obstacle to this is the need to maintain a "T" rating. Folks will get around word filters and make obscene ASCII art and the like. For what it's worth I agree with the intent of the idea, but with respect I can't see this approach being acceptable.

Gangrel
Offline
Last seen: 19 hours 52 min ago
11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 09/15/2013 - 15:14
Impulse King wrote:
Impulse King wrote:

I touched on this in the SG registrar thread briefly. The main obstacle to this is the need to maintain a "T" rating. Folks will get around word filters and make obscene ASCII art and the like. For what it's worth I agree with the intent of the idea, but with respect I can't see this approach being acceptable.

If this is going to be a problem, then they might as well remove the chat system as well...

Quote:

1) I reject your reality.... and substitute my own
2) Not to be used when upset... will void warranty
3) Stoke me a clipper i will be back for dinner
4) I have seen more intelligence from an NPC AI in TR beta, than from most MMO players.

Comicsluvr
Comicsluvr's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 years 4 months ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 09/07/2013 - 03:39
Wow...there's one I never

Wow...there's one I never considered. Mean people ruin it for everybody lol

I remember when Star Wars was cool...a long, long time ago...

Redlynne
Redlynne's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 hours 14 min ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/28/2013 - 21:15
Impulse King wrote:
Impulse King wrote:

The main obstacle to this is the need to maintain a "T" rating. Folks will get around word filters and make obscene ASCII art and the like. For what it's worth I agree with the intent of the idea, but with respect I can't see this approach being acceptable.

So long as the bulletin board records who posted the current message, there's a pretty obvious "whodunnit" trail leading straight to the perpetrator. SG Leadership can then either discipline the perpetrator of such "obscenities" or the membership can decline as people "vote with their capes" to join other SGs that are better led/moderated.

Furthermore, I believe that the idea in question is an internal bulletin board ... [url=http://paragonwiki.com/w/images//5/5a/Corkboard_1.jpg]so[/url] [url=http://paragonwiki.com/w/images//d/de/Corkboard_2.jpg]basically[/url] [url=http://paragonwiki.com/w/images//d/d7/Corkboard_3.jpg]stuff[/url] [url=http://paragonwiki.com/w/images//a/ab/Corkboard_4.jpg]like[/url] [url=http://paragonwiki.com/w/images//d/d1/Whiteboard_1.jpg]this[/url] [url=http://paragonwiki.com/w/images//9/90/Whiteboard_2.jpg]in[/url] [url=http://paragonwiki.com/w/images//2/2e/Whiteboard_3.jpg]your[/url] [url=http://paragonwiki.com/w/images//f/f5/Whiteboard_4.jpg]Base[/url] ... which isn't on "public" display except when you've got non-SG members "touring" your SG Base.

[img]http://paragonwiki.com/w/images//5/5a/Corkboard_1.jpg[/img] [img]http://paragonwiki.com/w/images//d/de/Corkboard_2.jpg[/img] [img]http://paragonwiki.com/w/images//d/d7/Corkboard_3.jpg[/img] [img]http://paragonwiki.com/w/images//a/ab/Corkboard_4.jpg[/img]

[img]http://paragonwiki.com/w/images//d/d1/Whiteboard_1.jpg[/img] [img]http://paragonwiki.com/w/images//9/90/Whiteboard_2.jpg[/img] [img]http://paragonwiki.com/w/images//2/2e/Whiteboard_3.jpg[/img] [img]http://paragonwiki.com/w/images//f/f5/Whiteboard_4.jpg[/img]

In this case, I'd say take a page out of World of Warcraft and how they handle signs giving directions. On mouseover, the saved message posted on the bulletin board pops up in a text box on your screen ... that way the art for the object doesn't have to change at all. If you've got edit permission for the bulletin, just click on it to edit it like a Bio text box. The bulletin board will record the identity of the last SG member to edit it, complete with time stamp, so no Anonymous Dirty Messages. So although you'll be "able" to post naughty ASCII art if you want to ... everyone else in the SG will know that YOU did it and are responsible for it ... or that YOU are the last person who touched it, and therefore are responsible for the content. With attribution comes responsibility, and I figure that we can rely on SG's to self police well enough for this kind of problem to be essentially a non-problem, even if it exists to some small extent due to the "stew in your own juices" factor.

[center][img=44x100]https://i.imgur.com/sMUQ928.gif[/img]
[i]Verbogeny is one of many pleasurettes afforded a creatific thinkerizer.[/i][/center]

Brand X
Brand X's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 years 5 months ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 11/01/2013 - 00:26
Impulse King wrote:
Impulse King wrote:

I touched on this in the SG registrar thread briefly. The main obstacle to this is the need to maintain a "T" rating. Folks will get around word filters and make obscene ASCII art and the like. For what it's worth I agree with the intent of the idea, but with respect I can't see this approach being acceptable.

Last I recall, I thought the T rating wasn't effected by anything the player could do...like swearing when people disable the chat filter.

Lin Chiao Feng
Lin Chiao Feng's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 week 12 hours ago
Developerkickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 11/02/2013 - 09:27
There's usually an

There's usually an "Interaction with other players is not covered by ESRB rating" message in there somewhere.

That said, while I can see a simple "bulletin board" (basically a base object that displays a MOTD-like message set by whoever has write permission in the base) being implemented, and an event calendar could work just as well, too... I don't see why the devs would want to reimpllement phpBB in the game instead of just letting guilds find or build their own solution.

And before someone suggests putting hyperlinks in the bulletin board base objects, so clicking there takes you to an external site... how long before that's nothing but rickroll and goatse?

[i]Has anyone seen my mind? It was right here...[/i]

Gangrel
Offline
Last seen: 19 hours 52 min ago
11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 09/15/2013 - 15:14
Lin Chiao Feng wrote:
Lin Chiao Feng wrote:

There's usually an "Interaction with other players is not covered by ESRB rating" message in there somewhere.
That said, while I can see a simple "bulletin board" (basically a base object that displays a MOTD-like message set by whoever has write permission in the base) being implemented, and an event calendar could work just as well, too... I don't see why the devs would want to reimpllement phpBB in the game instead of just letting guilds find or build their own solution.
And before someone suggests putting hyperlinks in the bulletin board base objects, so clicking there takes you to an external site... how long before that's nothing but rickroll and goatse?

A simple calender/events list/"Major announcements"/guild info page would be handy though.

Because not everyone has the "skills" or knowledge of where to look for decent hosting. Some just want something that is *in game* to check for information.

My guild in WoW (for example) whilst I was playing had about 40-50 active members. We used WoW's ingame calender to set up events for the players, as well as the general Guild announcement (when you log into the game) to spread important information.

Having stuff *ingame* makes it easier to make sure that you get players involved. That is not to say that I am expecting built in forum access into the game, or full html customisation for events, but I think that headway can be made to improve on what CoX had (changing the announcement when you log into the game, that was dumped into your SG chat), and making it easier to organise events as well without having to go out of game.

Quote:

1) I reject your reality.... and substitute my own
2) Not to be used when upset... will void warranty
3) Stoke me a clipper i will be back for dinner
4) I have seen more intelligence from an NPC AI in TR beta, than from most MMO players.

Wanders
Wanders's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 years 2 months ago
kickstarter11th Anniversary Badge
Joined: 10/25/2013 - 20:12
Lin Chiao Feng wrote:
Lin Chiao Feng wrote:

There's usually an "Interaction with other players is not covered by ESRB rating" message in there somewhere.

Indeed. Also, the OP's idea included letting SG permissions control what ranks could post, so that (and the accountability of who posted what) seems like the game would have taken the players reasonable tools for managing it.

Quote:

That said, while I can see a simple "bulletin board" (basically a base object that displays a MOTD-like message set by whoever has write permission in the base) being implemented, and an event calendar could work just as well, too... I don't see why the devs would want to reimpllement phpBB in the game instead of just letting guilds find or build their own solution.

This. When I saw the idea, and considered why leaders might want to restrict the ability, it felt like the ingame bulletin board would just be a compromise for SGs that didn't have forum/calendar elsewhere. Ideally you'd want anyone in the SG to be able to create an event, and that is less of a can of worms on an individual SGs page than it is on an ingame feature. That said, there were lots of SGs that were not made up of 'random' people, so I expect they'd be comfortable opening up the ingame event board to all members in cases like that.

I guess another option would be to let the ingame board subscribe to an RSS feed on the site that the leaders moderate, but there'd be no policing of what the leader set it to (or of what would end up there if that site was hijacked at some point) so whee.

Anyway, I always thought it would be nice if the corkboards and whiteboards were less static. At the very least, it would have been nice if if the static whiteboard content was less salesteam-y. :3

Global: @Second Chances
SG: Fusion Force
"And it's not what I wanted
Oh no, it's not what I planned
See it's not where I thought I'd be
It's just where I am"